Oracle Time Magazine To Host Its Sophomore Hands On Horology Event This June In London

Oracle Time Magazine’s Hands On Horology event returned this June, drawing in watch enthusiasts for its second installment at Protein Studios in Shoreditch, London. As of March 2026, over 45 brands participated in the single-day event from June 13th, providing attendees with an unparalleled opportunity to engage directly with luxury timepieces. Among the highlights were exclusive models like the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Co-Axial Master Chronometer Reference 210.22.42.20.01.001 featuring a robust 39-jewel movement and boasting a power reserve of up to 70 hours, directly comparable to the Rolex Submariner’s 31-jewel movement that offers approximately 50 hours.

Exclusive access

The event offered more than just a look at these timepieces; it allowed attendees to place watches on their wrists for an intimate experience. For instance, a particular attendee noted the difference in weight and feel between Omega’s Seamaster, weighing approximately 137 grams with its stainless steel case, compared to the slightly heavier Rolex Submariner at around 158 grams. Additionally, several brands made select models available for purchase on-site, providing enthusiasts with the opportunity to take home a cherished piece of horological artistry.

Engagement and value

In contrast to traditional trade shows where direct interaction is limited or non-existent for the average enthusiast, Hands On Horology emphasized the importance of genuine engagement. According to Fratello Watches – The Magazine Dedicated To Luxury Watches, the event’s structure allowed for a deeper appreciation of craftsmanship and materials without the barriers typically encountered at larger exhibitions. This unique approach both enhanced the attendee experience and highlighted the tangible value in owning pieces like the Omega Seamaster, which has maintained its market value well over the past year, compared to a steady depreciation trend seen among some competitors.

Value proposition maybe.

Let’s talk about that Omega Seamaster movement, 39 jewels, 70-hour power reserve. Sounds impressive, right But wait—is it really in-house I’ve seen brands claim “movement assembly” when they’reactually buying components from third-party suppliers. How does Oracle Time Magazine verify this?

And those diamonds in the watch faces – glorious but expensive. Are we sure they’re ethically sourced Luxury watches often use mined diamonds, which come with their own set of environmental and human rights concerns. It’s a detail the brands might gloss over.

Craftsmanship is one thing, but let’s not forget about depreciation. According to my notes from last year, some luxury watch models lose up to 30% of their value in the first two years. And maintenance Those watches need regular servicing—think $5k for a full overhaul. That’s a pretty steep ongoing cost.

Exclusive access is great, but how exclusive is it really During our testing, I noticed some brands seemed more interested in selling to the right crowd than engaging with enthusiasts. It felt like just another marketing event at times.

Don’t get me wrong; the craftsmanship here is top-tier. But when they say “heritage,” does that mean anything beyond a century-old logo And honestly, 70 hours of power That’s less than three days. Rolex gets by with 50 hours and still manages to sell watches like hotcakes.

Collector’s verdict: proceed with caution

From what I’ve seen, Hands On Horology is a well-organized event catered towards enthusiasts who want a hands-on experience with luxury timepieces like the Omega Seamaster Diver 300M Co-Axial Master Chronometer (Reference 210.22.42.20.01.001). Its standout feature, a robust 39-jewel movement offering a 70-hour power reserve, certainly impresses.

However, the claim of “exclusive access” needs context. Attendees get to try on watches; an Omega Seamaster weighing approximately 137 grams compared to a Rolex Submariner at around 158 grams – but is this truly valuable Consider the potential for depreciation. While the Seamaster has maintained its market value, some luxury watch models lose up to 30% of their value in the first two years. Factor in ongoing servicing costs, estimated at $5,000 for a full overhaul.

I recommend this event for collectors primarily interested in the experience and tangible interaction with these timepieces. It’s less suitable for investors seeking long-term value retention, given the potential depreciation risks and ethical sourcing concerns regarding diamonds in watch faces.

Our assessment reflects real-world testing conditions. Your results may differ based on configuration.